Monday, March 14, 2011

Sweat - Zora Neale Hurston (Review)

Zora Neale Hurston’s Sweat is a story about Delia Jones, a hard workingwoman who washes clothes for a living. It is evident from the very beginning that she suffers the abuse of her husband, Sykes, as he beats and even tries to kill her by scaring her to death. The story is about these two characters, symbolizing the battle between good and evil.

I liked the story and the realism of the characters. Even though I had trouble getting around the way the dialog was written, I was able to get around it by reading a summary/analysis from a different website. It definitely helped me have a better understanding of Hurston’s short story.

Good vs. Evil plays a huge role in Sweat, with Delia and Sykes embodying, respectively, Good and Evil. Delia’s sweat represents her hard work and her desire to do honest work. Even when her husband beats her down, and it looks like she’s on the hardest of times, she continues on and never shows signs of giving up. On the other hand, Sykes is a sinful and evil person. Sykes is an ungrateful person and doesn’t quite realize how great his wife really, and does this by sleeping around with a woman who doesn’t even compare to Delia. He practically keeps her around to be his own personal punching bag. What happens to him in the end is karma, and this is foreshadowed from the very beginning when he tries to scare his wife to death with a bullwhip. After all the Delia had been through, Good triumphed over Evil, but her act of leaving Sykes to die makes us wonder. Does that one thing make her just as bad as he was?

Sunday, March 13, 2011

The Thing - Dir. John Carpenter (Review + Analysis)



John Carpenter’s The Thing is one of the director’s best films and is easily up there on my list of ‘Favorite Movies’.  Combining the horror and sci-fi horror together, Carpenter re-tells the story of Christian Nyby and Howard Hawks’ black and white film, The Thing from Another World.  The first film in Carpenter’s “Apocalypse Trilogy”, The Thing follows an American research team in Antarctica as they are pitted against a parasitic extraterrestrial life form that has the ability to assimilate other life forms and in turn, imitate them.  The research team consists of: MacReady (Kurt Russell) – Helicopter Pilot, Blair (Wilford Brimley) – Senior Biologist, Fuchs – Assistant Biologist, Garry (Donald Moffat) – Station Commander, Childs (Keith David) – Chief Mechanic, Nauls – Cook, Palmer – Assistant Mechanic, Copper – Doctor, Norris – Geologist, Bennings – Meteorologist, Clark – Dog Handler, and Windows – Radio Operator.  Not knowing who’s human, the team members must carefully decide whom they can trust.


(Top - Macready, Blair, Fuchs, Garry | Middle - Childs, Nauls, Palmer, Copper | Bottom - Norris, Bennings, Clark, Windows)

While watching this film, there is a certain philosophy to the creature itself.  The alien life form has the ability to assimilate, create, and become perfect imitations of other life forms.  The copy is perfect until it feels threatened, thus revealing its true form in order to defend itself.  The concept is simple until you think about the creature in depth.  When we first see The Thing, it has taken the form of an Alaskan malamute fleeing across Antarctica’s snowy terrain.  It has escaped a Norwegian scientific station (having killed all but two members of the research team) and seeks refuge with the American research team.  As we observe the “dog”, it calmly walks around the station.  There are a few scenes in which the “dog” sits in different areas of the station, as if it were listening to the team members and strategically planning how it will consume the film’s protagonists.  In the ‘dog kennel scene’, it can be debated as to whether or not the ‘Dog-Thing’ (designed by special effects wizard, Stan Winston) deliberately sacrifices itself in order for a part of it to make a stealthy escape and assimilate one of the team members.  After all, while everyone is focused on this monstrous being, a piece of the tentacle slithers out and away from the kennel. 
As we’ve seen in the film, The Thing exists in many different forms.  It can take on the form as large as the “Blair-Thing” to as small as the blood in the Petri dish (the ‘Blood Test Scene’).  Another interesting aspect is how the creature thinks after it has taken the form of a human.  In the film, we see the transformation of Palmer and Norris from human to monster to get an idea of the creature’s thought process.  In the scene where Norris transforms into the “Norris-Thing”, his head detaches from the body and turns into a spider-like creature.  As it crawls away, Palmer, brings it to everyone’s attention when he says “You gotta be fucking kidding me” (at this point, Palmer has to be The Thing because the ‘Blood Test Scene‘ immediately follows).   By saying this, does Palmer not know that he is an imitation or does he point out the "spider-thing" so that he can pass more convincingly as a human?  But as the blood test is about to be conducted on Palmer, he has a very uncomfortable and uneasy look on his face, which suggests that the “Palmer-Thing” possesses some sort of self-awareness.  The best part about this film is that the viewer can come up with many different theories to what the creature is and how it acts.

(From this)


(To this)




Any other setting wouldn’t have worked for this film.  The secluded station in Antarctica conveys the terror and paranoia that is present throughout the movie.  The most prominent theme in this film is trust.  Since The Thing can flawlessly copy other life forms (humans, animals, etc.), it’s hard for everyone to tell each other apart.  Trust deals with the psychology of human behavior.  Carpenter uses this theme to effectively create one of the greatest scenes in film history, ‘The Blood Test Scene’.  Here, MacReady has become so frustrated with The Thing and upset with his fellow team members (if they are even human), that he devises a way to flush the creature out of hiding.  Fearing that the creature will retaliate, MacReady ties everyone up first before he reveals his grand plan.  “We're going to draw a little bit of everybody’s blood, because we're gonna find out who's The Thing.  Watching Norris in there... gave me the idea that maybe every part him was a whole.  Every little piece is an individual animal, with a built in desire to protect its own life.  You see when a man bleeds, it's just tissue.  But blood from one of you Things won't obey when it's attacked.  It'll try to survive.  Crawl away from a hot needle, say.”  This scene is great because of the tension built as MacReady slowly narrows down who is and isn’t The Thing.  The scene not only builds tension between the characters, but also with the viewers.



The whole idea of trust plays a big role when asking the following question about the film’s ending: Was Childs, the station’s chief mechanic, The Thing?  By the end of the film there are five members left alive: MacReady, Garry, Childs, Nauls, and Blair.  The first four are most definitely human, but Blair, who at this point has been locked in a shack outside of the station, may or may not be The Thing.  We eventually find out that he is, because he kills both Garry and Nauls, and eventually transforms into the ‘Blair-Thing’.  After an intense battle, MacReady is able to incinerate the monster with a stick of dynamite.  But what happened to Childs?  Well, early on when MacReady, Garry, and Nauls went to confront Blair, Childs was appointed to guard one of the entrances into the station.  When there is a power outage, the three men witness Childs abandoning his post.  He doesn’t reappear until the ‘Blair-Thing’ has been killed and MacReady is sitting among the burning rubble drinking from a bottle of whisky.  His disappearance supports the possibility that he has been assimilated into The Thing.  If we analyze some key scenes in the film, the first piece of evidence is when Childs is standing guard by the entrance, he is wearing a blue parka, but when he reappears he is now wearing a beige parka. 

 (The blue parka)
(The beige parka)


It should be noted that when The Thing takes over someone, it tears through the victims clothes (as pointed out in these scenes: a) the Bennings assimilation and b) the planted evidence of MacReady’s torn shirt).  Another piece of evidence is when they’re sitting together at the end.  MacReady offers the bottle of whisky to Childs, and when he takes the bottle MacReady laughs quietly to himself.  Fuchs states earlier in the movie, “MacReady, I've been thinking.  A small particle of this thing is enough to take over an entire organism, then everyone should prepare their own meals.”  If this were the case, why would Childs gladly take the bottle with the risk of being assimilated?  When MacReady laughs to himself, as Childs drinks from the bottle of whisky, it is at this point when he realizes that Childs is The Thing.  This is a reference to an earlier scene when MacReady loses to Chess Wizard, a computer program, and pours his glass of whisky into the computer calling it a “cheating bitch”.  He views this moment as a game of chess, believing that if Childs is The Thing, it will take a swig from the bottle so that when it hands the bottle back to MacReady, he’ll drink it, thus assimilating the last surviving team member.

Though a box office failure when it arrived to theaters in 1982, the home video release of The Thing has since gone on to gain a cult following.  Its failure in theaters is due to the fact that moviegoers were watching popular science fiction films such as: Blade Runner, E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial, and Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan (all of which were released in 1982).  Carpenter’s idea to take a single genre, Science Fiction, and incorporate horror elements into it, has made the film unique unto its own.  It has great study of human behavior as they are put into a horrifying situation.  The practical effect used for each of the monsters gives a much more realistic tone to the film, trumping most visual effects seen today, and is very effective in creating fear in the audience.  With Ennio Morricone’s ominous score and Carpenter’s direction to invoke fear in the viewer, The Thing is one of the most memorable sci-fi/horror films of all time.


Friday, March 11, 2011

Sunshine - Dir. Danny Boyle (Review)





Danny Boyle’s Sunshine (2007) is not only his most underrated film in his career, but it’s also one of the most overlooked movies in 2007. Set in the year 2057, the Sun is dying and all life on Earth is in danger. Sunshine stars Cillian Murphy, Rose Byrne, and Chris Evans, are just a few of the crewmembers on a spacecraft that is sent to re-ignite the sun with a massive nuclear bomb, after another crew disappears in the vastness of space. 

What makes this film interesting, and separates itself from other science fiction movies is that gives the viewer that feeling of claustrophobia not only on the spaceship, Icarus II (Boyle’s shout out to Greek mythology), in which the crew resides, but also in space. We get this feeling, especially when Boyle puts the audience inside the suit (see below):

  


In past science fiction films, they usually have a crew in a ship and that’s it, they don’t really factor in what all would be needed to survive. In Sunshine, each crewmember is assigned a task to keep each other alive. For example: there’s a biologist that’s in charge of taking care of the on-ship garden, which supplies the ship with oxygen; a psychiatrist that keeps the crew members sanity in check during the long trip to the sun. Others include: a communications officer; an engineer; a navigator; the ship’s pilot; the captain; and most importantly, the physicist that knows how to operate the bomb. Once disaster hits, as expected by the audience, each of the crew member must decide who is more important and who is expendable.  Even though they're potentially sacrificing their lives to re-ignite the sun (many factors set in: the bomb going off before they reach their destination, running out of oxygen supply, etc), it's a terrifying concept that one would have to be prematurely sacrificed and not even know if the mission is a success of not.


Overall, this is one of my favorite films, and I recommend it any science fiction fan that hasn’t checked it out yet. One last thing that I would like to mention is that Sunshine has one of my favorite sequences ever filmed.  If you decide to watch it or already have seen it, let me know what you think in the comments section.



Romancing the Stone - Dir. Robert Zemeckis (Review)


  

Before director Robert Zemeckis had Marty McFly gun it to 88mph, he directed a romantic comedy called Romancing the Stone. This was his third feature length movie, which featured Michael Douglas and Kathleen Turner in the leading roles. The story revolves around Joan Wilder (Turner), who writes a series of popular romance titles, who gets caught up in an adventure unlike anything she has ever written. After her sister is kidnapped, Joan travels to Colombia, where she teams up with Jack T. Colton (Douglas), an American mercenary, and the two unite to save her sister and locate a hidden treasure.



(Michael Douglas looking SUPER badass)

This movie is another example why the 80's was a great decade for movies. Zemeckis does well in capturing not only a romantic comedy, but a great action adventure as well. What’s great about this movie is the character development of the two primary characters. Jack has this Han Solo-esque quality to him, initially helping Joan for $375. Joan, on the other hand, is a bookish type, whose only adventures comes within her imagination and the only male companion in her life is Romeo, her house cat. Chased by a corrupt police chief through the jungles of Colombia, involved in intense car chases, and driving their car over a waterfall. These are just a few of the situation the protagonists get in over the course of the film.

I had seen this film as a kid and even recalled quite a few of the scenes while re-visiting it. I thought this movie was quite good, as it had a great mix of romance, action, and adventure. I would recommend this to anyone interested in a modern-day (although it takes place in the 80’s) Indiana Jones.





(Bonus video)


Rashomon - Dir. Akira Kurosawa (Review)

Rashōmon, directed by Akira Kurosawa, tells the story of three men that seek refuge from a storm in an abandoned gatehouse (Rashōmon).  Of the group, the priest and the woodcutter recount the story, with the commoner listening, in which a bandit rapes a woman and murders her husband, a skillful samurai.  Throughout the film, the story is told from four different perspectives (the woodcutter, the bandit (played by Kurosawa's muse, Toshirō Mifune), the woman, and the dead husband). 

I enjoyed the way the movie was told and how the characters changed from the different perspectives.  In one recount the woman is almost pitiful, while in another story she is seen as the one who orchestrates the duel between her husband and the bandit.  The storytelling plays with the audiences' minds, as they attempt to figure out which story is actually true, if any of them are even true. 

This movie was masterfully directed.  On a technical level, Kurosawa uses light to his advantage, being able to direct the viewers' eyes in several different scenes.  He keeps us engaged in the story, allowing us to follow what's going on without ever missing the beat of the movie.  It makes the movie aesthetically pleasing.  Light is used by Kurosawa to
symbolically represent evil and sin.  Take this scene below:





An innocent woman, taking a break while her husband seeks to buy weapons from the bandit.  The light is used to foreshadow the horrific events that are about to come.

This movie goes on to show that Kurosawa is a master filmmaker, and I will make it a point to watch more of his films (specifically: The Hidden Fortress, Ran, Stray Dog, Throne of Blood) very soon.

Wonderfalls - "Wax Lion" (Review)


I read a lot about film, television etc., and I was very surprised that I had not even heard about this show at all.  This short-lived series, on Fox, told the story of Jaye Tyler, who works a dead-end job as a clerk at a Niagara Falls gift shop.  In the pilot episode, 'Wax Lion', she begins to hear voices from various toys and statues (starting with a wax lion).  These voices instruct her to help the people around her, in which things end up going awry.

This show was pretty ambitious and had an interesting concept going for it, but in the end I felt that it was doing too much for a pilot episode.  The pilot focused too much on CGI and fast cuts between scenes, instead of building characters worthy of a better television show.  The writers were trying to make a quirky and unique television series, with dialogue that was mostly 'miss'.  Unfortunately, it took me nearly the entire episode to start laughing at some of the jokes they were throwing out at the audience.  I did like the ending of the episode was a good set-up for the rest of the series' episodes, having Jaye hear the voices again telling her to help more strangers.  Despite the rough "take off" in 'Wax Lion', maybe someday I'll give the rest of the episodes a shot.

Part 1 of 'Wax Lion' can be seen below.  Parts 2-5 can be seen after the jump (click on the video).